Case No. 2006.1388E - Seismic Upgrade of Bay Division Pipelines Nos. 3 and 4

4 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2008042007
Lead Agency
San Francisco, City and County of (City and County of San Francisco)
Document Title
Case No. 2006.1388E - Seismic Upgrade of Bay Division Pipelines Nos. 3 and 4
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
The Project consists of improvements to upgrade the seismic and hydraulic reliability of the SFPUC's regional water system where Bay Division Pipelines (BDPL) Nos. 3 and 4 cross the Hayward fault in Fremont, CA. The Project includes installation of a new pipeline, BDPL No. 3X (up to approximately 2,360 feet long) adjacent to BDPL No. 3, and improvements to BDPL No. 4. The Project also includes relocation and replacement of utility lines. See attached for additional project description information.

Contact Information
Diane Sokolove
San Francisco City and County, Planning Department
1650 Mission Street, Suite 400
San Francisco, CA 94103-2479

415-575-9046

Location

Coordinates
37°29'45"N 121°55'19"W
Cities
Fremont
Counties
Alameda
Cross Streets
Mission Boulevard and I-680 Interchange
Zip
94539
Total Acres
29
Parcel #
519-1244-72,519-1244-74,519-1456-64,519-1689-67,519-1689-68
State Highways
I-680, I-880, SR-262
Railways
Western/Southern pacific
Airports
None
Schools
Kidango Inc. Kiddo Land Learning Center, James Leicht Elementary
Township
5S
Range
1W
Section
13
Other Information
Medacom College, Northwestern Polytechnic University, Warm Springs Elementary, Fred Weibel Elementary, Fremont Unified School District, Wyo Tech

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
City and County of San Francisco
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
San Francisco Planning Department Major Environmental Analysis Division 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94103

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search