Crystal Springs/San Andreas Transmission System Upgrade Project
11 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2008022054
Lead Agency
City and County of San Francisco
Document Title
Crystal Springs/San Andreas Transmission System Upgrade Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
5/13/2010
Present Land Use
SFPUC Peninsula Watershed Management Lands
Document Description
The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SPFUC) approved the Crystal Springs San Andreas Transmission Upgrade Project ("Project") by Resolution 10-0081 on May 11, 2010. The project as approved by the SFPUC involves;
- Seismic and functional upgrades to the Upper Crystal Springs Dam Culverts, including seismic strengthening of the Lower Culvert, which crosses the San Andreas Fault rupture zones.
- Implementation of habitat mitigation sites including, but not limited to, full implementation of the San Andreas and Adobe Gulch habitat improvement sites.
The project is a capital improvement project approved by the SFPUC as part of the Water System Improvement Program ("WSIP"). The WSIP was approved by the SFPUC on October 30, 2008 by Resolution No. 08-0200.
Contact Information
Name
Timothy Johnson
Agency Name
City and County of San Francisco Planning Department
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Burlingame, Hillsborough, Millbrae
Counties
San Mateo
Cross Streets
Skyline Blvd, I-280
Total Acres
135
Parcel #
093070998, 093070071, 093070072...
State Highways
280, 92
Schools
Meadows ES, Odyssey
Waterways
San Mateo Creek
Base
SanMateo
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
City and County of San Francisco
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.