Boulder Creek Restoration Project
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2008012087
Lead Agency
Plumas County
Document Title
Boulder Creek Restoration Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
5/29/2008
Present Land Use
R20 residences/ R20 (Rural, 20 acre minimum), FP/Limited Opportunity R20, Floodplain
Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Game is executing Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement number 1600-2008-0033-R2, pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project applicant, Plumas Corporation. Restoration of approximately 17 acres of meadow floodplain for Boulder Creek through the selective placement of 13 plugs and creation of 11 ponds within 2,982 feet of the gullied channel of Boulder Creek and the redirection of water flows into an existing remnant channel within the associated meadow of Boulder Creek. A grade control structure using 12 cubic yards of 3 foot plus diameter boulders and 36 cubic yards of 2 foot or less diameter rock will be built at the downstream end of the project to return flows from Boulder Creek into Sulphur Creek.
Contact Information
Name
Robert C. Hosea
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Game
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Plumas
Cross Streets
~3 miles southwest of Clio within Whitehawk Ranch development off Hwy 89, Boulder Drive
Parcel #
133-130-079-000
Waterways
Sulphur Creek, Middle Fork Feather River
Township
21N
Range
13E
Section
5, 6
Other Location Info
City/Nearest Community: Clio
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Department of Fish and Game
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.