Meeting for Phase 2 and Future Phase 3 of Diablo Water District's Well Utilization Project
5 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2008012009
Lead Agency
Diablo Water District
Document Title
Meeting for Phase 2 and Future Phase 3 of Diablo Water District's Well Utilization Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
12/22/2008
Document Description
Phase 1 was completed in 2006 and included a well and pump station along with pipelines located in Glen Park in the City of Oakley. The Pahse 1 Glen Park well has a maximum pumping capacity of 2 million gallons per day (mgd) during high demand periods, and has been operating at an annual average pumping rate of about 0.75 mgd over the entire year, including low demand periods when pumping rates are lower.
Phase 2 consists of a second well an 18-inch diameter pipe, 2,300 feet long, to convey water from the new well to the existing 18-inch well pipeline at Glen Park (Phase 1) which conveys water to the DWD blending facility at the Randall-Bold Water treatment Plant. Phase 2 is anticipated to have pumping capacities similar to Phase 1 with a range between 0.5 to 2 mgd.
Contact Information
Name
Mike Yeraka
Agency Name
Diablo Water District
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Oakley
Counties
Contra Costa
Cross Streets
Between Sellers and Main
Zip
94561
Total Acres
2.8
State Highways
4
Waterways
Marsh Creek
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Diablo Water District
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
N/A
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.