Diamond Springs Parkway Project - Phase 1A (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2016-0217-R2)
10 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2007122033
Lead Agency
El Dorado County
Document Title
Diamond Springs Parkway Project - Phase 1A (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2016-0217-R2)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/14/2017
Present Land Use
Industrial
Document Description
CDFW has executed Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2016-0217-R2, pursuant to section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project Applicant, the County of El Dorado Community Development Agency.
Project consists of the realignment of SR 49/Diamond Road from Pleasant Valley Road to north of Lime Kiln Road. SR-49/Diamond Road will be aligned to the west to create a frontage road for residences along the east. The realigned road will be improved with two 12 foot lanes and 8 foot shoulders. This project comprises Phase 1A of the larger Diamond Springs Parkway Project, which is a proposed future four-lane divided roadway connecting Missouri Flat Road to SR-49.
The road realignment will require the filing of 0.089 acre of stream channel and removal of 0.212 acre of riparian/upland vegetation. In order to maintain drainage for the realigned roadway and to minimize the impact to biological resources, a new channel will be created and vegetated to the east of the realigned roadway.
Contact Information
Name
Gabriele Quillman
Agency Name
CDFW
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Diamond Springs
Counties
El Dorado
Cross Streets
SR 49 (Diamond Road) and Pleasant Valley Road
Zip
95667
Parcel #
several
State Highways
Hwy 49, 50
Railways
Sacramento-Placerville
Schools
Herbert Green Middle
Other Information
Sections Continued: 30,19
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.