8 Washington/Seawall Lot 351 Project

3 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2007122027
Lead Agency
City and County of San Francisco
Document Title
8 Washington/Seawall Lot 351 Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/22/2012
Present Land Use
Lots owned by the Golden Gateway Center are occupied by the Golden Gateway Tennis & Swim Club and are in Residential/Commercial Combined: High Density (RC-4)
Document Description
On the north side of Washington Street, between the Embarcadero and Drumm Street, the project proposes to demolish the existing surface parking lot and Golden Gateway Tennis and Swim Club, and construct a new health club totaling approximately 16,350 square feet with adjacent outdoor aquatic and recreation use, residential buildings ranging from four to twelve stories in height containing 134 dwelling units, ground-floor retail uses totaling approximately 20,000 square feet, and approximately 327 off-street underground parking spaces. The project would also construct new public open space.

Contact Information

Name
Paul Maltzer
Agency Name
San Francisco Planning Department
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
San Francisco
Counties
San Francisco
Cross Streets
Washington Street, Drumm Street, The Embarcadero
Zip
94111
Parcel #
Assessor's Block 168/Lot 58, Block, 171/Lot 69,Block 201/Lot 12,&Block 201/Lot 13
State Highways
I-80,I-280,U.S. 101
Railways
CalTrain, SF Muni, BART
Airports
No
Schools
John Chin ES,Francisco MS,Galileo Academy of Science & Technolog
Waterways
San Francisco Bay

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
City and County of San Francisco
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print