2014 Explanation of Significant Differences - Groundwater Extraction and Treatment System (GET) F Sprayfield (Sprayfield) & Propellant Burn Area (PBA)

2 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2007102056
Lead Agency
Department of Toxic Substances Control
Document Title
2014 Explanation of Significant Differences - Groundwater Extraction and Treatment System (GET) F Sprayfield (Sprayfield) & Propellant Burn Area (PBA)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
5/23/2014
Present Land Use
The majority of the property is currently open land use for cattle grazing. The property is located within the proposed development project currently undergoing entitlement process through the City of Rancho Cordova. The Draft EIR/EIS for the Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project defines a mix of residential, commercial, light industrial, and open space.
Document Description
Approval of an Explanation of Significant Differences (ESD) by the DTSC to add the Sprayfield source area to a list of other contaminated areas to a previously approved Remedial Action Plan (2008 RAP) for Soil and Groundwater at the IRCTS Approval of the ESD is consistent with DTSC's authority under California Health and Safety Code section 25356.1.

Contact Information

Name
Peter MacNicholl
Agency Name
Department of Toxic Substances Control
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Rancho Cordova
Counties
Sacramento
Cross Streets
Sunrise Blvd. and Douglas Road
Total Acres
2800
State Highways
50
Airports
Mather Field
Waterways
Folsom South Canal, American River
Township
8N
Range
7E
Section
4,5,8,
Base
MDB&M
Other Information
Section: 9

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
DTSC
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
No
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above. You may also contact the OPR via email at state.clearinghouse@opr.ca.gov or via phone at (916) 445-0613.

Download CSV New Search Print