Conditional Use Permit #2007-03/Coso ("Hay Ranch Water Extraction and Delivery System")
6 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2007101002
Lead Agency
Inyo County
Document Title
Conditional Use Permit #2007-03/Coso ("Hay Ranch Water Extraction and Delivery System")
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
3/18/2009
Document Description
The proposed project involves pumping water from two existing wells at Coso's Hay Ranch property in Rose Valley (adjacent to and east of Highway 395, just north of Coso Junction, and half mile south of Dunmovin) for injection into their geothermal field located within the China Laek Naval Air Weapons Center (CLNAWS). Water will be withdrawn from the wells at an average rate of 3,000 gallons per minute, or ~4,800 acre ft per year. The water will be piped from the Hay Ranch property to the geothermal facility, a distance of 9 miles. The water pipeline will consist of a 20 inch diameter steel pipe, which will be buried for most of its length, and which will follow the general path of existing roads and associated rights of way. The CUP is proposed for a period of 30 yrs.
Contact Information
Name
Tanda Gretz
Agency Name
Inyo County Planning Department
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Counties
Inyo
Cross Streets
Highway 395 and Gill Station Coso Road
Zip
93526
Total Acres
59.9
Parcel #
037-040-23; 037-070-08; 037-032-01
State Highways
395
Other Location Info
City/Nearest Community: Coso Junction
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Inyo County
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.