Fieldcrest Villages Project
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2007092025
Lead Agency
City of Fairfield
Document Title
Fieldcrest Villages Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
1/9/2009
Document Description
The project applicant proposes to develop 394 single-family homes within two villages on the project site. In 1994, the proposed development of 394 units had a previously approved Tentative Subdivision Map and Development Agreement supported by a Mitigated Negative Declaration. For the project under review, extensive grading (approximately 4.4 million cubic yards) is required due to past landslide activity, and would be balanced on site. After grading, approximately 29% of the project site (76.5 acres) would be developed and the remainder (190.5 acres) would be maintained as open space. Vehicular ingress and egress from the project site would be provided via Redtop Road through a new signalized intersection proposed as part of the project, which would be the only entrance to the project site. A second point of emergency vehicle access would be provided through an access route that originates on Oakbrook Circle. No public vehicular access would be allowed on this emergency vehicle access.
Contact Information
Name
Joseph Lucchio
Agency Name
City of Fairfield
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Fairfield
Counties
Solano
Cross Streets
Red Top Road and Oakbrook Drive
Zip
94533
Total Acres
267
Parcel #
180-090-030; 180-020-040; 180-070-030; 180-251-070; 180-080-090
State Highways
I-80, I-680, SH-12
Railways
California Northern
Schools
Oakbrook Elementary and Rodriguez High School
Waterways
American Canyon Creek and Jameson Creek
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
City of Fairfield
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.