El Dorado 89 Segment 1- Luther Pass to Meyers Water Quality Improvement Project
5 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2007082167
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 3
Document Title
El Dorado 89 Segment 1- Luther Pass to Meyers Water Quality Improvement Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/5/2008
Present Land Use
Existing State and County highway right-of-way, National Forest
Document Description
The project would implement water quality improvement measures along State Route 89 in El Dorado County between Luther Pass and US 50 to comply with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit requirements and address planned water quality improvement identified in the Lake Tahoe Basin Environmental Improvement Program and the Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board's 1995 Basin Plan.
Contact Information
Name
Jody Brown
Agency Name
Caifornia Tansportation Commission
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
South Lake Tahoe
Counties
El Dorado
Cross Streets
On SR-89 from Luther Pass at the El Dorado/Alpine County line (PM 0.0) to intersection of SR-89
State Highways
50, SR-89
Airports
South Lake Tahoe
Schools
Lake Tahoe District
Waterways
Upper Truckee River, Grass Lake/Creek, various creeks and drainages
Other Location Info
City/Nearest Community: Meyers
Other Information
Cross Streets (con't): and US Highway 50 (PM 8.6) in the community of Meyers, CA
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Transportation Commission
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
No
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.