Crystal Springs-San Andreas Transmission System Upgrade Geotechnical Studies

2 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2007082151
Lead Agency
San Francisco, City and County of (City and County of San Francisco)
Document Title
Crystal Springs-San Andreas Transmission System Upgrade Geotechnical Studies
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/15/2008

Document Description
The objective of this investigation is to confirm the location of the San Andreas Fault along the southern end of Lower Crystal Springs Reservoir (trench) and identify the depth of bedrock and characterize soil types in the area (bore) to support the engineering design for the project, and potentially minimize ground disturbance during construction. One 4-8 inch bore, and one trench measuring ~50-100 feet long and a maximum of 3 feet wide and 12 feet deep (0.003-0.006 ac) would be conducted within the high-water mark along Lower Crystal Springs Reservoir located near Highway 92 and I-280 in San Mateo County. The California Department of Fish and Game is executing a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement Number 1600-2008-0366-3 pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project Applicant, Anastasio Mavroudis, San Francisco Public Utilities Commission.

Contact Information
Wes Stokes
California Department of Fish and Game
Bay Delta Region P.O. Box 47
Yountville, CA 94599

Phone : (707) 944-5571

Location

Cities
Millbrae
Counties
San Mateo
Cross Streets
I-280 and Crystal Springs Road
Total Acres
378
Parcel #
093070998 (and others)
State Highways
I-280
Schools
Meadows Elementary School
Waterways
San Andreas and Crystal Springs Reservoirs
Base
SanMateo

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
California Department of Fish and Game
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final Environmental Document Available at
1001 I Street P.O. Box 4025 Sacramento, CA 95812

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
N/A
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
N/A
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
N/A
Download CSV New Search