Jellys Ferry Road Bridge Replacement Project (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 2081-2015-0348-R1 (LSAA))

11 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2007082085
Lead Agency
Tehama County
Document Title
Jellys Ferry Road Bridge Replacement Project (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 2081-2015-0348-R1 (LSAA))
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
The project consists of three elements; replacement of the existing bridge, realignment of Jellys Ferry Road, and relocation of a portion of the Bureau of Land Management recreational facilities. The purpose of the project is to provide a safe vehicular crossing over the Sacramento River on Jellys Ferry Road by replacing the existing structurally and seismically deficient bridge with a new bridge that meets current design standards. As such, replacement of the bridge is needed to improve public safety. The project will result in impacts to 0396 acres of Sacramento River Winter-Run Chinook Salmon and Central Valley Spring Run Chinook Salmon habitat including temporary impacts to 0.95 acres; the Project will permanently remove 0.01 acres of Sacramento River Wnter-Run Chinook and Central valley Spring-Run Chinook habitat. The project is expected to result in incidental take of Sacramento River Winter-Run Chinook and Central Valley Spring-Run Chinook, which are designated as endangered and threatened species, respectively, under CESA.

Contact Information
Adam McKannay
CDFW, Northern Region
601 Locust Street
Redding, CA 96001

530-225-2124

Location

Cities
Red Bluff
Counties
Tehama
Cross Streets
Jellys Ferry Rd
Zip
96080
Total Acres
20
Parcel #
9-150-34, 35, 36; 9-160-01; 9-120-23
State Highways
5
Waterways
Sacramento River
Township
28N
Range
3W
Section
3
Base
M

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
601 Locust Street, Redding, CA 96001

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Download CSV New Search