Royer Park to Harding Boulevard Bike Trail Project - Alternative 6 Bridge
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2007082016
Lead Agency
City of Roseville
Document Title
Royer Park to Harding Boulevard Bike Trail Project - Alternative 6 Bridge
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/21/2007
Present Land Use
Open Space / Flood Area (City of Roseville General Plan, 2003)
Document Description
The City of Roseville is proposing to construct a pedestrian/bike bridge over Dry Creek as part of the previously approved Royer Park to Harding Boulevard Bike Trail Project. This bridge would be constructed downstream from Harding Boulevard to allow bicyclists to cross from the south side of Dry Creek to the north side. Construction of the bridge would provide the public with a safe and convenient alternative to the bridge crossing over Antelope Creek (approved as part of previously approved Route A bike trail alignment) and the use of the Harding Boulevard on street route.
Contact Information
Name
Mark Morse
Agency Name
City of Roseville
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Roseville
Counties
Placer
Cross Streets
Harding Boulevard
Zip
95678
Parcel #
015-130-016
State Highways
I-80, SR-65
Railways
UPRR
Schools
Adelante HS, Roseville HS, Independence HS
Waterways
Dry Creek, Antelope Creek, Miners Ravine
Township
10,11N
Range
6E
Section
1, 35
Base
MDB&M
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Roseville City Council
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.