Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project (TRtP) Segment 7, and 8, Southern California Edison Company, Notification No. 1600-2010-0026-R5 Major Amendment 2
17 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2007081156
Lead Agency
California Public Utilities Commission
(CPUC)
Document Title
Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project (TRtP) Segment 7, and 8, Southern California Edison Company, Notification No. 1600-2010-0026-R5 Major Amendment 2
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
11/8/2013
Present Land Use
Multiple Land Uses - Crosses 3 Counties and 23 Cities
Document Description
Based on the Federal aviation administration recommendations, SCE proposed to modify the approved Project. The modifications include installation of marker balls along 271 transmission line spans and aviation lights on 90 transmission structures within Segments 5,6,7,8,10, and 11 with selective structural modifications, when needed. Additional, SCE proposed engineering refinements in Segment 8 between Chino Substation and Mira Loma Substation. These refinements include reducing the height of 21 transmission structures by approximately 20 feet through a combination of shorter tubular steel poles and specially designed dead-end lattice steel towers.
Contact Information
Name
Jason Coontz
Agency Name
CA Public Utilities Commission
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Ontario, Tehachapi
Counties
Kern, Los Angeles, San Bernardino
State Highways
Hwy 2, 14, 19, 39, 57, 60, 138
Schools
Multiple
Waterways
San Gabriel River, Rio Hondo, Amargosa Creek
Other Location Info
Crosses 23 cities
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Public Utilities Commission
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.