6th Street Viaduct Replacement Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2015-0034-R5 - Revision 2).

4 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2007081005
Lead Agency
Los Angeles, City of (City of Los Angeles)
Document Title
6th Street Viaduct Replacement Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2015-0034-R5 - Revision 2).
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/5/2015
Present Land Use
PLU: developed, heavy-light industrial Z: heavy industrial, public facilities, light industrial GP: heavy industrial, public facilities, light industrial

Document Description
CDFW has executed Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2015-0034-R5 - Revision 2, pursuant to section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project applicant, City of Los Angeles. The project is limited to the demolition and reconstruction of the 6th Street Viaduct between Mateo Street and Boyle Avenue. The purpose of the project is to replace the viaduct due to structural weakening from Alkali Silica Reaction. The 6th Street viaduct is currently 3500 ft long 55 ft, the new viaduct will use the existing 3500 ft long footprint and will vary between 85.5 ft wide to 100 ft wide.

Contact Information
Kelly Schmoker
CDFW South Coast Region
3883 Ruffin Road
San Diego, CA 92123

Phone : (949) 581-1015

Location

Cities
Los Angeles Los Angeles, City of
Counties
Los Angeles
Cross Streets
Mill St and east of southbound I-5
Zip
90033,12
State Highways
101, I-5
Railways
BN&SF, UPRR
Airports
No
Schools
SotoStES,BishopMoraSalesian,MetropolitanHS,ParaLosNinosChater
Waterways
Los Angeles River
Township
1S
Range
13W
Section
34
Base
SBB&M

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
CDFW Region 5, 3883 Ruffin Road, San Diego, CA 92123

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search