2015 Urban Growth Review and Sewer Advisory Vote Ballot Measure
114 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2007072023
Lead Agency
City of Modesto
Document Title
2015 Urban Growth Review and Sewer Advisory Vote Ballot Measure
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
5/15/2015
Document Description
The 2015 Urban Area Growth Policy Review Measure "M" advisory vote ballot measure will be placed on the November 3, 2015, municipal election ballot for extension of sewer improvements. The project implements General Plan Community Growth Strategy policies for support and enhancement of neighborhoods and timely provision of infrastructure. The ballot measure, described below, is based on City Council direction to prepare a comprehensive Measure "M" ballot measure for the remaining unincorporated County "island" areas. The proposed ballot measure would include the following planning areas located in the Baseline Developed Area of the City's General Plan: All residentially developed unincorporated areas that have not been the subject of a prior sewer extension advisory vote ballot measure.
Contact Information
Name
Patrick Kelly
Agency Name
City of Modesto
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Address
Phone
Location
Cities
Modesto
Counties
Stanislaus
Regions
Citywide
Cross Streets
Highway 99 and Highway 132
State Highways
99, 108, 132
Railways
BNSF, UPRR, M&ET
Airports
Modesto Ci.-Co. Airport; Harry S
Waterways
Dry Creek, Tuolumne River, Stanislaus River
Other Information
Airports (Cont): Harry Sham Field
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
City of Modesto
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.