PG&E Line 407 Pipeline Project Phase 2 (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement NO. 1600-2015-0167-R2)
12 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2007062091
Lead Agency
California State Lands Commission
Document Title
PG&E Line 407 Pipeline Project Phase 2 (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement NO. 1600-2015-0167-R2)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
4/25/2016
Document Description
PG&E is constructing the project to connect to existing Lines 400 and 401 in Yolo County to the existing Line 123 in Placer County. Line 407 East will be approx. 12 miles long and will cross Sutter and Placer Counties. Line 407 will connect existing Line 123 with the future Line 407 West in Placer County. Line 407 West will be approx. 13.5 miles long and will connect existing Line 172A with future Line 407 East near the junction of Powerline Road and Riego Road in Sutter County. The project will also include the construction of five fenced, aboveground pressure limiting, pressure regulating, metering, and main line valve stations, and aboveground line markers and electrolysis test stations.
Contact Information
Name
Patrick Moeszinger
Agency Name
CDFW
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Roseville, Sacramento, Woodland
Counties
Sutter
Railways
UPRR
Airports
Sacramento International
Schools
various
Waterways
Sacramento River, Creeks, drainage canals, irrigation canals
Other Location Info
West Riego Road and Garden Hwy
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.