Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) Line 406-407 Natural Gas Pipeline (California Endagered Species Act Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2081-2009-023-02)

12 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2007062091
Lead Agency
California State Lands Commission
Document Title
Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) Line 406-407 Natural Gas Pipeline (California Endagered Species Act Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2081-2009-023-02)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
The project involves construction a 30 inch diameter natural gas pipeline (Lines 406 and 407) and a new distribution feeder main from Esparto in Yolo County east to a location near Roseville in Placer County. The project also involves the construction of 6 above-ground facilities. The project will result in permanent impacts to 1.47 acres of Swainson's hawk (Buteo swainsoni; SWH) nesting habitat, and 0.62 acres of giant garter snake (Thamnophis couchi gigas; GGS) habitat. Additionally, the project will result in temporary impacts to 44.58 acres of California tiger salamander (ambystoma californiense; CTS) upland habitat, and 182.16 acres of GGS habitat. The project is expected to result in the take of SWH, CTS, and GGS, species protected by CESA.

Contact Information
Kent Smith
Department of Fish and Game
North Central Region 1701 Nimbus Road, Suite A
Sacramento, CA 95670

916-358-2900

Location

Cities
Woodland Sacramento Roseville
Counties
Yolo Sutter Sacramento Placer
Railways
UPRR
Airports
Sacramento International
Schools
various
Waterways
Sacramento River, Creeks, drainage canals, irrigation canals
Other Location Info
Esparto, Elverta

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Department of Fish and Game
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
DFG 1701 Nimbus Rd, Suite A Rancho Cordova, CA 95670

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search