Salt River Ecosystem Restoration Project
18 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2007062030
Lead Agency
Humboldt County
Document Title
Salt River Ecosystem Restoration Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
10/31/2011
Present Land Use
PLU: Agricultural (mostly dairy) and forestry
GP: Agricultural Exclusive, Agriculture Grazing, and Timber Production
Z: Agricultural Exclusive, 60 acre minimum (AE-60), Timberland Production (TPZ), and Unclassified (U)
Document Description
The Project proposes a comprehensive ecosystem restoration project including 1) restore and maintain approximately 300 acres of agricultural lands at Riverside Ranch to tidal marsh and riparian habitats; 2) restore and maintain approximately 7 miles of aggraded river channel with accompanying riparian habitats; and 3) implement a program of small-scale upslope restoration projects to reduce sedimentation and enhance habitats. The Project being considered by CSLC includes the General lease - Public Agency Use for phase I of the Salt River Restoration Project of State-owned lands over a 10-year term.
Contact Information
Name
Beverly Terry
Agency Name
California State Lands Commission
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Ferndale
Counties
Humboldt
Zip
95536
Total Acres
1103
State Highways
101, SR 211, SR 36
Railways
No
Airports
No
Schools
No
Waterways
Eel River, Salt River, Williams, Francis, and Reas Creeks, Pacific Ocean
Township
2N,3N
Range
2,1W
Section
34,35
Other Information
Sections con't: 36, 1, 2, 31
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CA State Lands Commission
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.