Salt River Ecosystem Restoration Project

18 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2007062030
Lead Agency
Humboldt County
Document Title
Salt River Ecosystem Restoration Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/19/2011
Present Land Use
PLU: Agricultural (mostly dairy) and forestry GP: Agricultural Exclusive, Agriculture Grazing, and Timber Production Z: Agricultural Exclusive, 60 acre minimum (AE-60), Timberland Production (TPZ), and Unclassified (U)
Document Description
The project is a comprehensive ecosystem restoration project including: 1) Restoration of approximately 356 acres of agricultural lands (Riverside Ranch) to tidal marsh and riparian habitat. 2) Restoration of approximately 7 miles of aggraded river channel and associated riparian habitat. 3) Implementation of a program of small-scale upslope restoration projects to reduce sedimentation and enhance habitats.

Contact Information

Name
Tony Chappelle
Agency Name
Wildlife Conservation Board
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Ferndale
Counties
Humboldt
Zip
95536
Total Acres
1103
State Highways
101, SR 211, SR 36
Railways
No
Airports
No
Schools
No
Waterways
Eel River, Salt River, Williams, Francis, and Reas Creeks, Pacific Ocean
Township
2N,3N
Range
2,1W
Section
34,35
Other Information
Sections con't: 36, 1, 2, 31

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Wildlife Conservation Board
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print