Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency-Phase 2, Natomas Levee Improvement Program Landslide Improvements Project (Issuance of California Endangered Species Act In
31 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2007062016
Lead Agency
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency
Document Title
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency-Phase 2, Natomas Levee Improvement Program Landslide Improvements Project (Issuance of California Endangered Species Act In
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/24/2009
Document Description
2nd Addendum to the Phase 2 Project EIR which analyzes the impacts of constructing a cofferdam in the Natomas Cross Canal at the RD 1000 Pumping Plant No. 4 outfall to raise the outfall structure, additional vegetation removal at the Prichard Pumping Plant along the Sacramento River east levee, and removal of the central segment of the Central Main Flume east of the Sacramento River east levee. The Phase 2 EIR was certified in Nov. 2007 and a Supplemental EIR was certified in Jan. 2009.
Contact Information
Name
John Bassett
Agency Name
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Sacramento
Counties
Sacramento
Cross Streets
Numerous
Zip
Numerous
Total Acres
53,000
Parcel #
Numerous
State Highways
I-5, SR 99, SR 70, I-80
Airports
Sacramento International
Waterways
Sacramento River/American River,Natomas Cross Canal,Natomas East Main Drainage Canal
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
SAFCA
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.