U.S. Bureau of Reclamation's Water Right Petition to the State Water Resources Control Board Requesting the Addition of 2,170 Acres to the Authorized Place of U

Summary

SCH Number
2007029010
Lead Agency
Fresno County
Document Title
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation's Water Right Petition to the State Water Resources Control Board Requesting the Addition of 2,170 Acres to the Authorized Place of U
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
1/26/2007
Document Description
The USBR holds one water right License and three water right Permits associated with the Friant diversion of the CVP (License 1986, Permits 11886 and 11887). The authorized place of use for License 1986 and Permit 11886 does not include municipal use as an authorized purpose of use. Permit 11887 includes municipal use as an authorized purpose of use; consequently, the USBR's petition is to add 2,170 acres to the authorized place of use for Permit 11887 and within this expanded place of use will allow municipal use as a purpose of use. USBR has stated that the expansion of the place of use to include the 2,170 acres will not result in any increase in the volume in total diversions from the San Joaquin River and will not result in changes to the Friant operations under License 1986 and Permits 11886 and 11887.

Contact Information

Name
Victoria A. Whitney
Agency Name
State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Water Rights
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Counties
Fresno, Madera

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
State Water Resources Control Board
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
N/A

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print