The Explosion Corridor Transit Project Phase 2

8 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2007021109
Lead Agency
Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority
Document Title
The Explosion Corridor Transit Project Phase 2
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
The Exposition Corridor Transit Project Phase 2 (Expo Phase 2) is intended improve transportation mobility and connectivity for residents and commuters in the project study area; provide faster, more reliable public transportation services; increase the capacity of the transportation system; and provide more travel choices. Expo Phase 2 project is located in the Westside of Los Angeles, extending approximately 7 to 8 miles from the Expo Phase 1 terminus in Culvert City to Santa Monica. The study area is generally bounded by Santa Monica and Pico Boulevards on the north, La Cienega Boulevard on the east, Washington Boulevard on the south and the Pacific Ocean on the west.

Contact Information
Daren Gilbert
California Public Utilities Commission
505 Van Ness Ave.
San Francisco, CA 94102

916 928 6858

Location

Coordinates
°29'31.3"N 34°0'49.5"W
Cities
Culver City Culver City, Santa Monica, Los Angeles, City of Los Angeles Santa Monica
Counties
Los Angeles
Cross Streets
Start at Venice/Robertson in Culver City, extends ~ 6-8 mi 4th St/Colorado in S. Monica
Zip
Various
Parcel #
Various
State Highways
I-10 and I-405
Railways
No
Airports
Santa Monica Municipal
Schools
Various
Waterways
Pacific Ocean, Ballona Creek, and Sepulveda Channel

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
California Public Utilities Commission
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
htttp://www.buildexpo.org/about-expo/phase-2-feir-document/

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search