Mark Feldman
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2006112113
Lead Agency
Humboldt County
Document Title
Mark Feldman
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/23/2007
Present Land Use
Developed with 3 single family residences, all of which are legal non-conforming.
GP: Dispersed Houses and Timber. Northern Humboldt General Plan. Density: 1 unit per acre (Dispersed Houses) and 1 unit per 20 acres (Timber).
Z: Unclassified (U)
Document Description
A minor subdivision of an approximately 30.74 acre parcel into two equally sized parcels of approximately 15.37 acres. The property is currently developed with three single family residences (legally constructed) and on-site wastewater treatment systems. Two of the residences, sharing a septic system, will be situated on Proposed Parcel 2. Proposed Parcel 1 is developed with the third residence, a separate septic system and a well serving all three dwellings. A Special Permit is requested to permit the smaller residence on proposed Parcel 2 as a secondary dwelling unit. No trees are proposed to be removed and no grading is proposed.
Contact Information
Name
Trevor Estlow
Agency Name
Humboldt County Community Development Services
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Arcata
Counties
Humboldt
Cross Streets
Fickle Hill Road
Zip
95521
Total Acres
30.7
Parcel #
313-203-02
Waterways
Black Dog Creek
Township
5N
Range
2E
Section
18
Base
HBM
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Humboldt CountyPlanning Commission
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
No
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.