Tippecanoe Well Construction Project
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2006111082
Lead Agency
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
Document Title
Tippecanoe Well Construction Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
1/8/2007
Present Land Use
Heavy Industrial
Document Description
Meeks and Daley Water Company (M&D) intends to construct a new well adjacent to Gage Canal Company's existing Gage 98-1 Well located in the City of San Bernardino. The well would be constructed to replace another well claimed by Caltrans under eminent domain.
Construction will include approximately 40 linear feet of 16-inch diameter discharge pipe that will connect to the existing Gage Canal piping. A stub out will be provided to allow for a future connection of approximately 2,400 feet of pipe. An approximate well flow rate of 3,000 gallons per minute (gpm) is anticipated. The well pump wil be designed to provide 3,000 gpm with a minimum 20 pounds per square inch (psi) at the current connection point and 5 psi at the ultimate discharge point 2,400 feet from the wellhead.
Contact Information
Name
Gayle Malone
Agency Name
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
San Bernardino
Counties
San Bernardino
Cross Streets
Cooley Avenue and Tippecanoe Avenue
Zip
92408
Total Acres
< 1
Parcel #
0281-041-15
State Highways
Highway 10
Railways
BNSF
Airports
San Bernardino International
Schools
Loma Linda Academy HS
Waterways
Santa Ana River
Township
1S
Range
4W
Section
23
Base
SB
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.