Consider Adoption of an Environmental Impact Report and Issuance of a General Lease - Right of Way
5 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2006102033
Lead Agency
California State Lands Commission
Document Title
Consider Adoption of an Environmental Impact Report and Issuance of a General Lease - Right of Way
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/4/2008
Present Land Use
The pipeline will cross predominantly agricultural land in unincorporated areas of Sacramento and San Joaquin Counties. The Cosumnes River Preserve and Stone lakes National Wildlife Refuge are within the project area.
Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Game is executing Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement number 1600-2008-0013-R2, pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project applicant, PG&E.
The project is proposing to perform maintenance activities to secure the integrity of Gas Line 172A. Two locations within Gas Line 172 A are in need of repair, once at mile point 35.67 and one at mile point 36.06. PG&E proposes to install a grout mat over the exposed pipeline in both ditches as well a flexible concrete revetment wall on the sides of both ditches.
Additionally, 12 inches or rip-rap will be added to the termination of the depression on the left descending bank of Petroleum Creek. The rip-rap footprint will be approximately 35' x 15'.
Contact Information
Name
Amy Kennedy
Agency Name
Department of Fish and Game
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Elk Grove
Counties
Sacramento, San Joaquin
Total Acres
11 mi. long
Railways
Union Pacific Rail Road
Airports
Franklin Field
Schools
Elk Grove and Thornton
Waterways
Mokelumne River, Cosumnes River, Sacramento River, irrigation canals
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
DFG
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.