Resolution of Necessity

6 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2006101130
Lead Agency
City of Riverside
Document Title
Resolution of Necessity
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
11/25/2008
Present Land Use
Commercial, Automotive Repair and Surface Parking Lots / Raincross District of the Downtown Specific Plan / Downtown Specific Plan
Document Description
Adoption of a Resolution of Necessity authorizing condemnation proceedings to acquire the property located at 3605 through 3633 Market Street and 3654 Fairmount Blvd. in the City of Riverside, for a public parking structure and to complete the restoration of the Fox Theater.

Contact Information

Name
Conrad Guzkowski
Agency Name
City of Riverside Planning Division
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Riverside
Counties
Riverside
Cross Streets
Market Street and Sixth Street
Zip
92501
Total Acres
5.97
Parcel #
213-182-003 thru 006, 010; 213-222-001 thru 003; 213-181-001 thru 012; 213-221-001 thru 003, 008
State Highways
SR-91, SR-60, I-215
Railways
Metrolink, BNSF
Schools
North HS, Central MS, Bryant ES, Patricia Beatty ES, Fremont ES,
Waterways
Santa Ana Riverside
Township
2S
Range
5W
Section
23
Base
SBB&M
Other Information
Parcel Nos Cont'd: 009 Schools Cont'd: Longfellow ES, Grant ES, St. Francis Catholic School, Lincoln Continuation School, Riverside Community College, Emerson ES.

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Riverside City Council
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print