Amendment 6 to Sunrise Powerlink Project's CA Endangered Species Act Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2010-0022-05 (ITP) issued to SDG&E

22 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2006091071
Lead Agency
California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC)
Document Title
Amendment 6 to Sunrise Powerlink Project's CA Endangered Species Act Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2010-0022-05 (ITP) issued to SDG&E
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
3/1/2019
Document Description
This project 500 kV transmission line from the Imperial Valley Substation to a new substation southeast of the town of Alpine, then continuing with a 230 kV transmission line to the Sycamore Canyon Substation. The project resulted in 2.83 acres of temporary and 2.71 acres of permanent impacts to barefoot-banded gecko habitat. SDG&E mitigated these impacts by purchasing the Mountain Springs Mitigation Property (approx. 199 acres). Amendment 5 extends the date to complete the transfer of the mitigation lands to June 22, 2018.

Contact Information

Name
Eric Weiss
Agency Name
CDFW South Coast Region
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
El Centro, San Diego
Counties
Imperial, San Diego
Cross Streets
Numerous in Imperial and San Diego Counties
State Highways
S22, S2, SR78 and others
Railways
Numerous
Airports
Numerous
Schools
Numerous
Waterways
Numerous
Other Location Info
City/Nearest Community: Boulevard

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print