Site 3 Firefighting Protection Training Area & Site 38 Former Skeet Range Soil Removal Actions, Beale Air Force Base

2 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2006082018
Lead Agency
California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC)
Document Title
Site 3 Firefighting Protection Training Area & Site 38 Former Skeet Range Soil Removal Actions, Beale Air Force Base
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/16/2007
Present Land Use
Industrial
Document Description
Site 3 is the Former Firefighting Training Area and Site 38 is the former Skeet Range at Beale Air Force Base, outside of Marysville, CA. The project involves the removal and disposal of approximately 6,000 cubic yards (cy) of contaminated soil. Approximately 4,500 cy of lead-contaminated soil will be removed from Site 38 and about 1,500 cy of dioxin-contaminated soil will be removed from Site 3. The soil is to be analyzed to be sure all soil above the interim cleanup levels is removed, and that it is disposed of in an appropriate landfill. The soil will be transported by registered hazardous waste haulers. The excavated areas will be backfilled with clean soil. Potential impacts to wetlands will be mitigated by Beale's approved wetlands preservation and restoration program.

Contact Information

Name
Terry M. Escarda
Agency Name
Department of Toxic Substances Control
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Marysville
Counties
Yuba
Cross Streets
Dolittle and J
Zip
95903-1708
Total Acres
44
Other Location Info
Beale AFB

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Department of Toxic Substances Control
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print