South Region Elementary School No. 7

3 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2006081115
Lead Agency
Los Angeles Unified School District
Document Title
South Region Elementary School No. 7
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
4/27/2007
Present Land Use
The project site currently contains 6 single-family units, 41 multi-family units, 4 businesses, and 1 bus stop.
Document Description
The proposed project includes the development of South Region Elementary School No. 7 within LAUSD South Region, Local District 7. The proposed project is intended to relieve overcrowding at nearby elementary schools, including: McKinley, Russell, 92nd Street, Griffith Joyner, Weigand, Grape and Ritter Elementary. The proposed project consists of 68,000 square feet development, including 38 classrooms, a multi-purpose room, library, administration offices and ~2 acres of playground area. The proposed project would provide two-semester seats on a single-track, two-semester calendar for kindergarten through sixth grade, and require ~75 teachers, staff and volunteers.

Contact Information

Name
Hoan Tang
Agency Name
Los Angeles Unified School District
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Los Angeles, Los Angeles, City of
Counties
Los Angeles
Cross Streets
East 89th Street, East 90th Street, and Compton Avenue
Zip
90002
Total Acres
4.29
Parcel #
6044-005- (parcels 1-18, 25-29, 31-33, 41-42)
State Highways
I-110 and I-105
Railways
Metro Blue Line
Schools
21 ES and 7 MS
Other Location Info
Community: Florence-Graham

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Los Angeles Unified School District
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print