Township 9 Project (formerly Capitol Station 65)
8 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2006072077
Lead Agency
City of Sacramento
Document Title
Township 9 Project (formerly Capitol Station 65)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/10/2014
Present Land Use
The City of Sacramento's General Plan land use designation for the project site is Special Planning District (SPD). Surrounding land uses consist of the American River to the North, industrial uses to the south, industrial/office use to the east, and industrial to the west. The site is predominately covered with impervious surface. Existing uses on the site include industrial and warehouse uses. All existing structures on the project site, totaling approximately 104 million square feet, would be demolished to accommodate the proposed project.
Document Description
To install vegetation, landscaping, and park features on the landslide slope of the levee.
Contact Information
Name
James Herota
Agency Name
Central Valley Flood Protection Board
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Sacramento
Counties
Sacramento
Cross Streets
Richards Boulevard between 5th and 7th Streets
Total Acres
65
Parcel #
001-0020-003, 014, 019, 033, 034, 036, 041, 044, 046
State Highways
5, 160, 80, 99
Railways
Southern Pacific
Schools
Sacramento Unified
Waterways
American River, Sacramento River
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Central Valley Flood Protection Board
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
N/A
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.