Capitol Station 65

8 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2006072077
Lead Agency
City of Sacramento
Document Title
Capitol Station 65
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/29/2007
Present Land Use
The City of Sacramento's General Plan land use designation for the project site is Special Planning District (SPD). Surrounding land uses consist of the American River to the North, industrial uses to the south, industrial/office use to the east, and industrial to the west. The site is predominately covered with impervious surface. Existing uses on the site include industrial and warehouse uses. All existing structures on the project site, totaling approximately 104 million square feet, would be demolished to accommodate the proposed project.
Document Description
Mixed use development of 65 acres with residential, neighborhood serving retail and restaurants, and with possible office uses.

Contact Information

Name
Jennifer Hageman
Agency Name
City of Sacramento
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Sacramento
Counties
Sacramento
Cross Streets
Richards Boulevard between 5th and 7th Streets
Total Acres
65
Parcel #
001-0020-003, 014, 019, 033, 034, 036, 041, 044, 046
State Highways
5, 160, 80, 99
Railways
Southern Pacific
Schools
Sacramento Unified
Waterways
American River, Sacramento River

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Cityo f Sacramento
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
N/A
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print