Renaissance Specific Plan
12 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2006071021
Lead Agency
City of Rialto
Document Title
Renaissance Specific Plan
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
11/22/2010
Present Land Use
PLU: Rialto Airport, Industrial & Commercial
Z: Airport Specific Plan
GP: Public Use-Airport, Industrial & Commercial
Document Description
Draft Environmental Impact Report (E.A.R. No. 06-03) addressing impacts associated with the proposed 1445.3 acre planned community commonly known as "Renaissance Rialto", General Plan Amendment No. 21 to designate the project area as a "Specific Plan" overlay on the Land Use Map of the Rialto General Plan Amendment No. 5 to the Rialto Airport Specific Plan to remove the project area and modify the boundaries of the Plan; and Renaissance Specific Plan No. 11 to designate the zoning and development standards for the project area.
Contact Information
Name
Gina Gibson
Agency Name
City of Rialto-Development Services
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Rialto
Counties
San Bernardino
Cross Streets
north by Casmalia St, south by Baseline Rd, east by Ayala Dr,west by Tamarind Ave
Zip
92376
Total Acres
1,445.3
Parcel #
various
State Highways
210
Airports
Rialto
Schools
2 HS, 2 MS, 11 Elementary
Waterways
Cajon Creek wash, Lytle Creek wash
Township
1N
Range
5W
Section
33,34
Base
SBB&M
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
City Council of the City of Rialto
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.