Concurrence in the Issuance of a Revised Solid Waste Facilities Permit for Sycamore Landfill Solid Waste Facility Permit No. 37-AA-0023, City of San Diego, San
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2006061091
Lead Agency
City of San Diego
Document Title
Concurrence in the Issuance of a Revised Solid Waste Facilities Permit for Sycamore Landfill Solid Waste Facility Permit No. 37-AA-0023, City of San Diego, San
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/13/2006
Present Land Use
Open Space designation
RS-1-1 and RS-1-8 zones
Document Description
Increasing the maximum peak daily tonnage from 3,300 tons per day with a monthly maximum of 75,833 tons to 3,965 tons per day with monthly maximum; change in the remaining site capacity from 20.6 million cubic yards to 48.1 million cubic yards, based on the Solid Waste Facilities Permit application instructions; and change in the closure date from 2016 to 2031. There were no proposed changes to days and hours of operation, permitted site area, permitted disposal footprint, maximum elevation or maximum depth of buried waste.
Contact Information
Name
Tadese Gebrehawariat
Agency Name
California Integrated Waste Management Board
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
San Diego
Counties
San Diego
Cross Streets
Mast Boulevard and West Hills Parkway
Total Acres
491
State Highways
52
Airports
MCAS Miramar
Schools
West Hills HS
Waterways
San Diego River
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Integrated Waste Management Board
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
N/A
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.