Kinsey Ranch
4 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2006052176
Lead Agency
Humboldt County
Document Title
Kinsey Ranch
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/14/2006
Present Land Use
PLU: The parcels together form a +/-7,000 acre ranch which has been in the cattle business since the early 1900s. The bridge placement is accessory to this use.
GP and Z: Agriculture Exclusive (AE) and Timber Producation Zone (TPZ). AE
Document Description
A Special Permit for the placement of a seasonal bridge over the East Branch of the South Fork of the Eel River. The bridge will be a 90' long x 9' wide steel "railcar" structure. The structure is needed between the months of May and November to access portions of the 7,000 acre ranch that cannot otherwise be accessed during the summer months. A Special Permit is required per the County's Streamside Management Area Ordinance (SMAO), §314-61.1 of the Humboldt County Code. Permits are also required from RWQCB, DFG and NOAA Fisheries.
Contact Information
Name
Alyson Hunter
Agency Name
Humboldt County Community Development Services
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Humboldt
Cross Streets
Project site is +/-2 miles outside of Humboldt County
Zip
95542
Parcel #
223-075-001, -02
State Highways
US HWY 101
Waterways
East Branch of the South Fork of the Eel River
Township
4s
Range
4e
Section
32
Base
HBM
Other Location Info
Benbow area
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Humboldt County Planning Director
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.