Bear River North and Grasshopper Slough Levees Rehabilitation Project
4 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2006052136
Lead Agency
Reclamation District 2103
Document Title
Bear River North and Grasshopper Slough Levees Rehabilitation Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/21/2006
Present Land Use
GP: Yuba County Valley Agriculture, Sutter County Open Space, and Placer County Agriculture.
Z: Yuba County Principle Waterway and Exclusive Agriculture with 40-acre minimum size (AE-40), Sutter County Special Flood Plain Combining District (P-FP), and Placer County Farm-Building Site-Mineral Reserve (F-B-X MR 80, F-B-X 20, and F-B-X 80).
Document Description
The District proposes to rehabilitate the Bear River north levee (BRNL) by constructing slurry walls within a number of vulnerable levee segments. Construction of the proposed slurry walls is intended to correct a design deficiency by limiting underseepage to meet safety standards and to help qualify the levees for Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) 100-year flood protection certification for the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). As part of the proposed project, RD 2103 also proposes to widen an approximately 1,300-foot length of the BRNL that has been subject to severe waterside erosion. In addition, the proposed project would implement minor improvements to the Grasshopper Slough levee that would include the replacement of corrugated metal culverts under the levee.
Contact Information
Name
Dean Webb
Agency Name
Reclamation District 2103
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Wheatland
Counties
Placer, Sutter, Yuba
State Highways
65
Waterways
Bear River, Dry Creek, Grasshopper Slough
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Board of Directors of Reclamation District 2103
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.