State Route 41 Kettleman City Rehabilitation Project - Agreement 2010-0109-R4
4 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2006051080
- Lead Agency
- Caltrans 6 (Fresno) (California Department of Transportation, District 6)
- Document Title
- State Route 41 Kettleman City Rehabilitation Project - Agreement 2010-0109-R4
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Document Description
- The California Department of Fish and Game is executing a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement, pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code, to the Project applicant. Caltrans proposes to widen the existing shoulder of SR 41 to 8 feet. To accommodate this, the pipe inlet in the Arroyo del Paso drainage on the west side of SR 41 must be extended 14.8 feet. Rock Slope Protection (RSP) and RSP fabric will be placed in the Arroyo del Paso drainage to reduce erosion west of SR 41. The Project will not affect any vegetation in the Arroyo de Paso drainage. Construction equipment will need to enter the channel, but no water will be present when work is done. One pre-construction survey specifically for San Joaquin kit fox (SJKF) and two pre-construction surveys specifically for blunt-nosed leopard lizards (BNLL) are proposed for the entire Kettleman City Rehabilitation Project. A total of 75.4 acres of compensatory mitigation will be acquired for permanent and temporary impacts to potential habitat for SJKF and BNLL as required by the Programmatic Biological Opinion.
- Contact Information
-
Lori Bono
Department of Transportation, District 6
2015 E. Shields Avenue, Suite 100
Fresno, CA 93726-5428
(559) 243-8288
Location
- Cities
- Kettleman
- Counties
- Kings
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- California Department of Fish and Game
- Approving Agency Role
- Responsible Agency
- Approved On
- Final EIR Available Location
- Caltrans - District 6 Environmental Planning 2015 East Shields Avenue Suite, 100 Fresno, CA 93728
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- No
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- Yes
- (4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- No
- (5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes