State Route 41 Kettleman City Rehabilitation Project - Agreement 2010-0109-R4

4 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2006051080
Lead Agency
Caltrans 6 (Fresno) (California Department of Transportation, District 6)
Document Title
State Route 41 Kettleman City Rehabilitation Project - Agreement 2010-0109-R4
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Game is executing a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement, pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code, to the Project applicant. Caltrans proposes to widen the existing shoulder of SR 41 to 8 feet. To accommodate this, the pipe inlet in the Arroyo del Paso drainage on the west side of SR 41 must be extended 14.8 feet. Rock Slope Protection (RSP) and RSP fabric will be placed in the Arroyo del Paso drainage to reduce erosion west of SR 41. The Project will not affect any vegetation in the Arroyo de Paso drainage. Construction equipment will need to enter the channel, but no water will be present when work is done. One pre-construction survey specifically for San Joaquin kit fox (SJKF) and two pre-construction surveys specifically for blunt-nosed leopard lizards (BNLL) are proposed for the entire Kettleman City Rehabilitation Project. A total of 75.4 acres of compensatory mitigation will be acquired for permanent and temporary impacts to potential habitat for SJKF and BNLL as required by the Programmatic Biological Opinion.

Contact Information
Lori Bono
Department of Transportation, District 6
2015 E. Shields Avenue, Suite 100
Fresno, CA 93726-5428

(559) 243-8288

Location

Cities
Kettleman
Counties
Kings

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
California Department of Fish and Game
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
Caltrans - District 6 Environmental Planning 2015 East Shields Avenue Suite, 100 Fresno, CA 93728

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search