Concurrence with the issuance of a Revised Solid Waste Facilities Permit for West Miramar Sanitary Landfill in the City of San Diego, Facility No. 37-AA-0020
5 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Print
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2006051004
- Lead Agency
- San Diego, City of (City of San Diego)
- Document Title
- Concurrence with the issuance of a Revised Solid Waste Facilities Permit for West Miramar Sanitary Landfill in the City of San Diego, Facility No. 37-AA-0020
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Posted
- 7/28/2020
- Project Applicant
- City of San Diego, Environmental Services Department
- Document Description
- Proposed project includes: Increase in vertical height from 485 MSL to 510 MSL; increase in estimated closure year from 2025 to 2031; and an increase in total permitted capacity from 87,760,000 cubic yards to 97,354,735 cubic yards.
- Contact Information
-
Cody Oquendo
Resources Recycling and Recovery, Department of (CalRecycle)
1001 I St. Sacramento, CA 958
sacramento, CA 95812
Phone : (916) 341-6719
cody.oquendo@calrecycle.ca.gov
Location
- Cities
- San Diego
- Counties
- San Diego
- Other Location Info
- Address: 5180 Convoy Street, San Diego, CA 92111
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- CalRecycle
- Approving Agency Role
- Responsible Agency
- Approved On
- Final Environmental Document Available at
- Custodian of Records, CalRecycle, Attn: Legal Office, 1001 I Street, P.O. Box 4025, Sacramento, CA 95812-4025. pubrecreq@CalRecycle.ca.gov
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- No
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes (Addendum)
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- No
- (4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
- No
- (5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- No
- (6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No