Stevens Creek Corridor Park Restoration

4 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2006042174
Lead Agency
City of Cupertino
Document Title
Stevens Creek Corridor Park Restoration
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/10/2008
Document Description
The City of Cupertino (the City) requested a Streambed Alteration Agreement to undertake a restoration project on a 100 foot long segment of Stevens Creek within the City's Steven's Creek Corridor Park where a much larger restoration project is currently under construction. This restoration project would include the removal of a 45-foot long by 10-foot wide retaining wall (450 sq ft) on the west bank; the removal of a 100-foot long by 10-foot (1,000 sq ft) wide section of rock rip rap on the east bank; slope toe reinforcement with boulders, the excavation of soil from 2.5 horizontal to 1 vertical bank; placement of a 48-foot long by 5-foot wide steel stringer, clear span pedestrian bridge; and revegetation of the site with native riparian corridor plants. The project is situated on a portion of the park property known as The Blackberry Farm, formerly a picnic area located at 21975 San fernando Avenue in Cupertino in Santa Clara County. The California Department o Fish and Game is Executing a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement Number 1600-2008-0383-3 pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the Project Applicant, Terry Greene, City of Cupertino.

Contact Information

Name
David Johnston
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Game
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Cupertino
Counties
Santa Clara
Cross Streets
Foothill Boulevard and Stevens Creek Boulevard
Zip
95014
Total Acres
60
State Highways
85, 280
Schools
Monta Vista HS
Waterways
Stevens Creek

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
California Department of Fish and Game
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print