Natomas Meadow Bridge (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2017-0223-R2)

4 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2006042003
Lead Agency
Sacramento, City of (City of Sacramento)
Document Title
Natomas Meadow Bridge (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2017-0223-R2)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
CDFW has executed Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2017-0223-R2, pursuant to section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project Applicant, David Ragland. The proposed project will widen the existing bridge crossing the Canal from two to four lanes and will include a median, bike lanes, and sidewalks. The concrete barrier and water line on the west side of the bridge will be removed for the project, construction will increase the total width of the bridge by 40 feet 3 inches in total to a width of 93 feet. The bridge length will remain the same. A new 12 in. water line will be constructed on the western side of the bridge. The canal will be dewatered by placing a coffer dam on the west side of the bridge. Ten 18 in. octagonal concrete pile-type piers and two abutments wil lbe constructed to keeping consist with the existing bridge design. A total of 0.09 acres of 1/4 ton rock slope protection will be placed on both banks of the canal for stabilization.

Contact Information
Tanya Sheya
CDFW
1701 Nimbus Road, Suite A
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670

916-358-2953

Location

Cities
Sacramento
Counties
Sacramento
Parcel #
225-0060-025, -026, -027
State Highways
I-5
Airports
Sacramento International
Waterways
Sacramento River

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
1701 Nimbus Road, Suite A, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Download CSV New Search