Cache Creek North Levee Setback Project - Critical Erosion Sites 1 and 2
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2006032057
Lead Agency
Central Valley Flood Protection Board
Document Title
Cache Creek North Levee Setback Project - Critical Erosion Sites 1 and 2
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
4/26/2006
Present Land Use
Agricultural Preserve
Document Description
The Reclamation Board, in association with USACE, is proposing to construct two setback levees along the north bank of Cache Creek at two critical erosion sites. On February 24, 2006, the Governor of California proclaimed that a State of Emergency exists for California's levee system and he included these sites as needing levee repair to prevent catastrophic failure which would result in significant environmental impacts. The new levees would be approximately 700 and 825 feet in length, and would be placed between 100 and 50 feet from the existing levee. The existing levee would remain in place and would be notched to allow for drainage.
Contact Information
Name
Deborah Condon
Agency Name
California Reclamation Board
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Yolo
Cross Streets
County Road 97A and 97B
Zip
95679
State Highways
I-5
Waterways
Cache Creek
Section
Rio Je
Base
Woodland
Other Information
Section: Jesus Maria Land Grant
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Reclamation Board
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.