Joseph Matteoli

2 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2006022133
Lead Agency
Humboldt County
Document Title
Joseph Matteoli
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
5/26/2006
Present Land Use
0.80 acre parcel currently developed with one legal nonconforming duplex (5 bedrooms total) and one detached single family residence (2 bedrooms). Z: Residential Single-Family with 6,000 sf parcel size (R-1*). GP: Residential Low Density (RL), Eureka Community Plan (ECP); 1 unit per 6,000 sf (6 du/ac).

Document Description
The Minor Subdivision of a 34,462 sf parcel currently developed with a single family residence and a legal nonconforming duplex. The subdivision seeks to place the existing units on to their individual lots and create a third lot for future residential development. The lots will range in size from +/- 6,371 sf (net) to 10,856 sf (net) and be accessed by an existing 40' wide road off Law Boulevard, a private road. Proposed Parcels 1 and 2 will be accessed via a 30' private road which requires an exception to the 40' road standard. Each parcel will continue to be served by community water and sewer. No changes or expansions to the existing duplex or single family residence are proposed. NOTE: This project includes reimbursement for traffic mitigation measures at the intersection at Hemlock and Walnut.

Contact Information
Alyson Hunter
Humboldt County Community Development Services
3015 H Street
Eureka, CA 95501-4484

Phone : (707) 268-3731

Location

Counties
Humboldt
Cross Streets
Law Boulevard and Walnut Drive
Zip
95503
Total Acres
~ 0.80
Parcel #
300-093-24
Schools
Cutten ES, Winship MS, Glen Paul School
Waterways
Humboldt Bay
Township
4N
Range
1W
Section
2
Base
HM
Other Location Info
City/Nearest Community: Cutten

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Humboldt County Planning Commission
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
N/A

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search