Folsom Dam Safety and Flood Damage Reduction - Evening Rock Blasting
30 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2006022091
Lead Agency
Central Valley Flood Protection Board
Document Title
Folsom Dam Safety and Flood Damage Reduction - Evening Rock Blasting
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
5/27/2014
Document Description
The Central Valley Flood Protection Board has prepared a Supplemental EIR to the Final EIS/EIR prepared in 2007 for the Folsom Dam Safety and Flood Damage Reduction Join Federal Project (JFP). This Supplemental EIR proposes a change in schedule for rock blasting in-the-dry and analyzes potential effects on noise, traffic, and recreation. Previously analyzed in the 2012 SEIS/EIR for the approach channel (SCH# 2012072039) was the need to excavate the rock plug using blasting methods. Blasting time frames included 1:30-2:30 pm and 10:00-11:00 am for the project duration (2013-2017). This supplemental EIR proposes an additional time from 7:00-8:00 pm for rock blasting operations to occur in-the-dry during the summer months of June through September of 2014 to 2017. Mitigation measures approved as part of the 2012 Approach Channel SEIS/EIR will be implemented to minimize potential impacts to the environment.
Contact Information
Name
Vincent Heim
Agency Name
Central Valley Flood Protection Board
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Folsom
Counties
Sacramento
Cross Streets
Folsom Lake Crossing between Folsom-Auburn Road and East Natoma Street
Zip
95630
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Central Valley Flood Protection Board
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.