Riverpoint Marketplace Tentative Subdivision Map EIR

3 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2006022055
Lead Agency
City of West Sacramento
Document Title
Riverpoint Marketplace Tentative Subdivision Map EIR
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/18/2006
Present Land Use
General Commercial Planned Development 23 (C-3 PD-23) and Community Commercial Planned Development 45 (C-2 PD-45)
Document Description
The project would entail subdividing the 11 existing parcels into 21 parcels. This would allow for the slight adjustment of parcel lines for the existing office building (108,000 sf) and the IKEA Home Furnishings (260,000 sf) and the additional development of 322,600 square feet. The existing office building and IKEA store would remain, however, circulation surrounding these lots would be reconfigured. Riverpoint Court would be realigned to connect to Harbor Boulevard and would terminate at a roundabout adjacent to the Wal-Mart parcel. Infrastructure to serve the project is already in place.

Contact Information

Name
Charline R. Hamilton
Agency Name
City of West Sacramento
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
West Sacramento
Counties
Yolo
Cross Streets
Reed Avenue, Harbor Boulevard
Zip
95691
Total Acres
73
Parcel #
014-793-02, -04, -05, -06, -10, -11, -12, -15, -16, -21
State Highways
I-80, US-50
Railways
UPRR
Waterways
Sacramento River

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
City of West Sacramento
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print