Weber Ranch - PUD 2004-04, SD 8919 & TR 2005-02

9 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2006012065
Lead Agency
City of Danville
Document Title
Weber Ranch - PUD 2004-04, SD 8919 & TR 2005-02
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/21/2011
Present Land Use
Vacant land and one single-family home/R-20(Single-Family Residential) District/Residential-Single-Family-Low-Density
Document Description
Preliminary Development Plan - Rezoning request PUD 2004-04 and Final Development Plan - Major Subdivision request SD 8919 seek approval to rezone a 15 +/- acre site from R-20; Single Family Residential District to P-1; Planned Unit Development District and to subdivide the site into 22 single family residential lots and one remainder 3.7 +/- acre parcel. Tree Removal request TR 2006-02 would authorize the removal of 25 Town-protected trees. A total of 93 trees (including Town-protected trees. A total of 93 trees (including Town-protected and non-protected trees) would be removed as part of this project.

Contact Information

Name
David Crompton
Agency Name
City of Danville
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Danville
Counties
Contra Costa
Cross Streets
Diablo Road & Matadera Way
Zip
94526
Total Acres
15
Parcel #
Multiple
State Highways
I-680
Schools
Multiple
Waterways
Green Valley Creek

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Town of Danville
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print