Esplanade Residential Development

2 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2005122011
Lead Agency
City of Concord
Document Title
Esplanade Residential Development
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/28/2006
Present Land Use
Auto dealership, a Masonic Temple (public art museum), office, and residential / Downtown Business District Office / Commercial Office
Document Description
The project would include demolition of existing structures and construction of two new buildings with up to 332 condominium residential units. Discretionary actions required for the project include a General Plan Amendment from Commercial Office to High Density Residential, an Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to change the land use designation in Exhibit A of the Downtown Business District regulations from Office to Residential. Future applications for Tentative Map, Use Permit for the condo development and building height, Variances, and Design Review will be submitted.

Contact Information

Name
G. Ryan Lenhardt
Agency Name
City of Concord
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Concord
Counties
Contra Costa
Cross Streets
Galindo Street, Concord Boulevard, and Clayton Road
Total Acres
3.32
Parcel #
126-143-001, 002, 003, 008, 009, 010, 011; 126-153-006, 007; 126-062-011
State Highways
242 and 680
Airports
Buchanan Field Airport

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Concord City Council
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print