PG&E Topock Compressor Station Site - In-Situ Hexavalent Chromium Reduction Pilot Test Work Plan
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2005101087
Lead Agency
California Department of Toxic Substances Control
(DTSC)
Document Title
PG&E Topock Compressor Station Site - In-Situ Hexavalent Chromium Reduction Pilot Test Work Plan
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
12/14/2005
Present Land Use
Recreational
Document Description
Pursuant to Chapter 6.5 of the Health & Safey Code, the Department of Toxic Substances Control is considering a request from PG&E for approval of an In-Situ Pilot Study Workplan that describes field activities for pilot tests to be conducted to evaluated in-situ technologies to reduce hexavalent chromium (CrVI) to trivalent chromium in groundwater in the Colorado River floodplain adjacent to the Topock site. The results of the pilot test would be used to:
- Evaluate the effectiveness and persistence of selected in-situ reductants under actual site conditions;
- Provide additional information on site conditions necessary to determine the feasibility of in-situ reduction of the CrVI plume;
- Assist with the selection of preferred in situ reductant(s) for possible long-term site management.
Contact Information
Name
Karen Baker
Agency Name
Department of Toxic Substances Control
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Needles
Counties
San Bernardino
Cross Streets
Park Moabi Road
Zip
92363
Total Acres
< 2
State Highways
40, 66
Railways
BNSF
Waterways
Colorado River
Township
7N
Range
24E
Section
6
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Department of Toxic Substances Control
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
No
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.