Snell Pipeline Inspection and Rehabilitation Project (Project) (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. EPIMS-SCL-32083-R3)

29 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2005101047
Lead Agency
Santa Clara Valley Water District
Document Title
Snell Pipeline Inspection and Rehabilitation Project (Project) (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. EPIMS-SCL-32083-R3)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/21/2023
Document Description
The Project will involve discharging approximately 13.53 million gallons of treated water into 11 locations within four different creeks (Thompson Creek, Canoas Creek, Upper and Lower Silver Creek, and Coyote Creek). The purpose of discharging treated water is to inspect and rehabilitate the Snell Pipeline

Contact Information

Name
Mayra Molina
Agency Name
CDFW
Job Title
Senior Environmental Scientist
Contact Types
Responsible Agency

Location

Cities
San Jose
Counties
Santa Clara
Regions
Northern California, San Francisco Bay Area
Other Location Info
The Project runs approximately 8.5 miles long, which begins at the Santa Teresa Water Treatment Plant and the Santa Teresa Hills in the City of San Jose and runs northeast through the City of San Jose before terminating at the connection to east Evergreen Pipeline, east of Capitol Expressway in the State of California.

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
County Clerk
Santa Clara
Final Environmental Document Available at
2825 Cordelia Road, Suite 100 Fairfield, CA 94534

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
No
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Attachments

Disclaimer: The Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) accepts no responsibility for the content or accessibility of these documents. To obtain an attachment in a different format, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above. For more information, please visit OPR’s Accessibility Site.

Download CSV New Search Print