Hanford LP Modification Title V Permit

2 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2005081028
Lead Agency
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District
Document Title
Hanford LP Modification Title V Permit
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/9/2005
Present Land Use
Existing coke-fired, 30 megawatt power plant / Heavy Industrial zoning
Document Description
Hanford L.P. has submitted an application for an Authority to Construct (ATC) equipment necessary to allow an existing coke-fired, 30 megawatt, power plant located in Kings County to burn higher sulfur content petroleum coke. This project is being undertaken to ensure supply of fuel for electricity generation when a source of low sulfur content petroleum coke fuel is not available or is not cost-effective. The ATC application request an increase in the SO2 emissions limit that will only apply when it is necessary to use high sulfur content petroleum coke because low sulfur content petroleum coke supply is neither available nor cost-effective. The high sulfur content petroleum coke will be transported to the site via haul trucks from Wilmington, CA. Transportation of high sulfur content petroleum coke will not result in an increase of vehicle exhaust emissions. In the event that higher sulfur content petroleum coke is used, Hanford L.P. will be required to provide SO2 emission offsets.

Contact Information

Name
Hector R. Guerra
Agency Name
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Hanford
Counties
Kings
Cross Streets
10596 Idaho Avenue
Zip
93230
Total Acres
5.94
Parcel #
018-242-055
State Highways
Hwy. 43
Railways
ATSF
Other Location Info
Approximately 4 miles north

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
No
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print