Miriam Park Development Project (California Endangered Species Act Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2014-059-02 (ITP)).

6 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2005072045
Lead Agency
Chico, City of (City of Chico)
Document Title
Miriam Park Development Project (California Endangered Species Act Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2014-059-02 (ITP)).
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
This proposed project includes the construction of 2,300 dwelling units, 250,000 square feet of retail space, 485,000 square feet of commercial space and civic uses, the construction of 1 bridge and 2 outfall structures at the Little Chico Creek. The Project will result in permanent impacts to 0.46 acres of Butte County meadowfoam (Limnanthes floccosa ssp. californica) habitat; and permanently remove 0.76 acres of upland habitat, and 0.02 acres of aquatic habitat, and have temporary impacts to 0.42 acres of upland and 0.06 acres of aquatic habitat for Giant gartern snake (Thamnophis gigas). The project is expected to result in incidental take of Butte County meadowfoam (Limnanthes floccosa ssp. californica) which is designated as an endangered species under the California Endangered Species Act. The ITP referenced above as issued by CDFW authorizes incidental take of species listed under CESA that may occur as a result of Project implementation.

Contact Information
Jeff Drongesen
CDFW North Central Region
1701 Nimbus Road
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670

916-358-2919

Location

Cities
Chico
Counties
Butte
Cross Streets
West side of Bruce Road between SH-32 and E. 20th Street
Zip
95928
State Highways
Hwy 32
Schools
Hank Marsh JH
Waterways
Little Chico Creek, Big Chico Creek, Dead Horse Slough

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
CDFW North Central Region, 1701 Nimbus Road, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search